- Hong Kong ETFs face challenges in matching the scale and dominance of US counterparts.
- Analysts project moderate inflows for Hong Kong’s ETFs, cautioning against unrealistic expectations.
- Hong Kong’s spot ETFs for virtual assets surged on May 3, led by Bitcoin ETFs with HK$43.41 million in trading volume.
The Hong Kong market reported an increase in trading volumes for spot ETFs associated with virtual assets on May 3. The overall trading volume came to HK$48.91 million, with Ethereum ETFs coming in second at HK$5.5 million and Bitcoin ETFs dominating at HK$43.41 million. On May 2, for instance, trading volume for US Bitcoin spot ETFs reached an astounding $1.72 billion, indicating a notable divergence in market activity.
The approval of spot Ethereum and Bitcoin ETFs by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has generated enthusiasm, but analysts are cautious about the possible inflows. Eric Balchunas, a senior ETF analyst at Bloomberg, projects moderate inflows of about $500 million, but he believes the Hong Kong market may struggle to reach the size of its US rivals.
Balchunas attributes this conservative estimate to several factors. Firstly, Hong Kong’s ETF market, valued at $50 billion, is relatively small compared to the US market. Moreover, restrictions on Chinese locals purchasing these ETFs limit potential demand. Additionally, the absence of major players like BlackRock in Hong Kong’s ETF landscape may hinder significant investments.
In addition, the Hong Kong market’s underlying ecosystem is thought to be less efficient and accessible than the US market, which causes premium discounts and larger spreads for exchange-traded funds. Additionally, investors used to lower-cost choices in the US may be put off by the relatively higher fees (1% to 2%) attached to Hong Kong ETFs, as noted by Balchunas.
Despite the anticipation surrounding the approval of ETFs in Hong Kong, Bitcoin is trading at $59,112.26, experiencing a growth of 0.73% in the last 24 hours. While Hong Kong ETFs may hold potential in the long run, they are unlikely to match the scale and dominance of their US counterparts upon launch.
Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.
