- Lily Liu said blockchain gaming is “not coming back,” sparking industry debate.
- Comments followed setbacks in metaverse and GameFi sectors, with declining user adoption.
- Developers argue digital ownership and blockchain-based gaming still hold long-term potential.
Solana Foundation president Lily Liu declared blockchain gaming finished on Friday, triggering a wave of debate across the crypto community, and an unusually self-aware response from her own organisation.
Liu sparked a community-wide debate on Friday after declaring on X that “gaming on a blockchain is not coming back” — a response to reports that Meta was pulling the plug on Horizon Worlds, its much-ridiculed virtual world that somehow consumed $80 billion of the company’s money without convincing many people to actually log in.
The Comment Heard Across Crypto Twitter
Liu’s post was brief, unqualified, and landed like a grenade in a room full of blockchain game developers. No nuance, no caveats, just a clean verdict from the president of one of crypto’s most prominent foundations, on a chain that had staked considerable credibility on gaming becoming its killer use case.
The timing was pointed. Meta’s retreat from its metaverse ambitions, a project so central that Mark Zuckerberg literally renamed his company after it, has become shorthand for what happens when billion-dollar optimism collides with user indifference.
The Punishment
Then came the internal response nobody expected.
Vibhu, a Solana Foundation employee, published a mock crisis communications statement that read, in part, that Liu’s remarks, while “factually correct and extremely based,” had caused irreparable harm to the gaming ecosystem.
The post racked over 76,000 views before Vibhu quietly clarified it was a shitpost and that, for the record, the Foundation employs no actual crisis communications team. The clarification itself became the punchline.
Related: Aster Chain Staking Goes Live With Dual Rewards System
The Serious Pushback
Not everyone was laughing, though. Developers and community members drew a sharp distinction between the discredited play-to-earn model, which essentially paid people to click through bad games, and the underlying concept of player-owned digital assets, which many insist remains genuinely compelling.
“If by gaming you mean play-to-earn games with nothing behind scam tokens, they should never come back,” one X user wrote. “But vague posts like this without careful phrasing don’t sit right with gaming teams.”
The Verdict the Industry Is Avoiding
GameFi token values sit roughly 90% below their 2021 peak. Axie Infinity, once the sector’s brightest star, is now its most-cited cautionary tale. Billions from a16z, Animoca Brands, and Framework Ventures have yet to produce a single blockchain game with durable mainstream appeal.
Others said that Liu may simply have said what many insiders have privately concluded for some time.
Related: Crypto Gets Clarity as SEC, CFTC Say Most Tokens Aren’t Securities
Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.
