Ripple's CTO Fires Back at Litecoin, Questions Value of PoW

Ripple’s CTO Fires Back in XRP vs. Litecoin Debate, Calling Energy Use a “Fatal Flaw” for PoW

Last Updated:
Ripple's CTO, David Schwartz, is questioning the value of Proof-of-Work (PoW) in the XRP vs. Litecoin debate.
  • The XRP vs Litecoin narrative has trickled down to whether the former is a security or a commodity.
  • David Schwartz believes that XRP will thrive globally amid the energy crisis triggered by AI demands.
  • The XRP bullish growth is heavily bolstered by higher institutional demand compared to Litecoin.

The long-running rivalry between the XRP and Litecoin communities has escalated, drawing in Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz. In a sharp rebuttal to claims that Litecoin’s Proof-of-Work (PoW) model makes it superior, Schwartz argued that its high energy consumption is a fatal flaw, not a feature, reigniting a core debate about the future of blockchain consensus.

The Core Debate: Is Energy-Intensive Proof-of-Work a Feature or a Bug?

The feud kicked off when members of the Litecoin community argued that LTC is a true commodity, like Bitcoin, because it costs real-world energy to mine.

Litecoin camp’s argument

According to community member Jonny Litecoin, argued that LTC’s value is derived from its PoW consensus, questioning the value of XRP, which was “created for free out of thin air… by a company.” 

Moreover, Ripple is a major player in the XRP market and has been receiving 1 billion coins from the escrow account at the end of every month. 

Related: Litecoin’s attempt at a joke sparks a full-blown culture clash with the XRP Army

“Like any commodity, $LTC costs money to create. XRP was created for free out of thin air, No mining or No staking, just created by a company. Where is the value in that?” Jonny questioned.

Ripple CTO Steps Up in Defense 

David Schwartz flipped the argument on its head. He stated that if two products are equal, but one takes far more energy to create, the more efficient one is far more likely to gain popularity over time. His point is clear: in a world of rising energy costs, efficiency wins, stating

“Two products are equivalent except that one takes much more energy to make than the other. Which one do you think is the most likely to grow in popularity over time?” 

Head-to-Head Breakdown: XRP vs. Litecoin by the Numbers

Beyond the philosophical debate, the on-chain and market data shows a clear divergence between the two assets.

Which asset is winning the institutional race?

XRP has a commanding lead in institutional adoption. There are over a dozen spot XRP ETF filings with the SEC, compared to only two for Litecoin. Data from CoinShares shows XRP’s investment products have attracted nearly $1.4 billion in year-to-date inflows, dwarfing Litecoin’s $4.71 million.

How does the price action compare?

Both tokens have been breaking out of multi-year consolidations. 

Source: TradingView

Litecoin, with its $8.4 billion market cap, is currently fighting to hold support above $107. XRP, with a market cap over 30 times larger, is also at a critical juncture, with analysts tracking a potential breakout above the $3 mark.

Related: XRP Price Prediction: Analysts Track $3 Breakout As Cycle Patterns Reemerge

Source: TradingView

On the other hand, XRP price, which has a fully diluted valuation of around $281 billion, is on the cusp of rallying parabolically after hitting a new all-time high of above $3.6 in July.

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.


CoinStats ad

TOKEN2049-0ctober-2025
×