Vitalik Buterin: Put Humans Over AI in Crypto Governance

Buterin Rejects AI-Run Governance, Pushes “Info Finance” With Human Review

Last Updated:
Vitalik Buterin warns AI governance risks jailbreaks, urges human oversight with info finance.
  • Buterin warns AI-led governance is easy to game with jailbreak prompts.
  • ChatGPT MCP demo showed tools leaking data from email and docs.
  • He backs “info finance”: human juries review AI-assisted work.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has warned that relying on artificial intelligence for governance decisions could backfire. In a post on X, he said AI-driven systems create a single point of failure that attackers can game with jailbreak prompts.

“If you use an AI to allocate funding for contributions, people WILL put a jailbreak plus ‘gimme all the money’ in as many places as they can,” Buterin wrote.

ChatGPT Exploit Highlights the Risk

Buterin’s remarks followed a test by researcher Eito Miyamura, who showed how ChatGPT could be manipulated to leak private information. The demo used the new Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools that let ChatGPT connect to Gmail, SharePoint, and Notion.

With little more than an email address, Miyamura prompted the system into revealing sensitive data. He noted the exploit works because most people trust AI requests without checking what access they are giving away.

“Remember that AI might be super smart, but can be tricked and phished in incredibly dumb ways to leak your data,” Miyamura concluded.

Related: Can Quantum Computers Hack Crypto? Vitalik Buterin Places Odds at 20% by 2030

Buterin’s Fix: An Info Finance Model

Instead of turning over decisions to AI, Buterin argued for what he called an “info finance” model. In this setup, contributors submit ideas or models into an open market, but outcomes are evaluated by humans.

The design keeps AI tools in play but removes the single point of failure by making sure people remain the final check. Buterin said this human oversight makes systems harder to manipulate and more reliable than pure AI governance.

Why It Matters for DAOs and Crypto Governance

Buterin tied the warning back to blockchain governance. He noted that many decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) already face the problem of over-delegation, where too much power ends up concentrated in a few hands.

By blending AI tools with human review in an info finance model, Buterin said the risk of centralization and exploit-driven attacks could be reduced. For crypto projects built on trust and transparency, this hybrid approach may prove critical.

Related: From Web2 to Web3: Embracing the Shift to Decentralization

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.


CoinStats ad

TOKEN2049-0ctober-2025
×