Controversial Proposal to Appoint CZ as LUNC Leader Sparks Backlash

Last Updated:
Controversial Proposal to Appoint CZ
  • The LUNC community stirs controversy by proposing to appoint Changpeng Zhao as the leader.
  • Criticism mounts as the community question the seriousness of the proposal.
  • Few users suggest imposing penalties on frivolous proposals.

The LUNC community recently found itself embroiled in a heated debate over a proposal that raised eyebrows and fueled controversy within the crypto community. The proposal, titled “Let’s make CZ (Binance CEO) as leader of Terra blockchain (Luna Classic),” prompted widespread criticism.

CosmoSreXx, an active member of the LUNC community, posted the contentious proposal on Twitter. He expressed dismay and criticized the idea, stating that making the blockchain appear like a meme undermines its credibility. CosmoSreXx argued that the proposal was embarrassing and appeared to surpass all previous far-fetched suggestions.

https://twitter.com/CosmoSreXx/status/1675743190505144320

The analyst further highlighted a knowledge gap in governance within the community, noting that voting someone into a leadership role without their consent contradicts the principles of a decentralized and community-owned blockchain. He emphasized the responsibilities of governing such a blockchain, calling for a more informed and thoughtful approach.

The proposal faced ridicule not only from community members but from the broader crypto community. One Shiba Inu enthusiast, claiming personal knowledge of Changpeng Zhao, the Binance CEO, dismissed the proposal, stating that the CEO would not even dignify such ‘nonsense’ with a response.

Another community member proposed a mechanism to prevent absurd proposals in response to concerns. The person asked whether it would be possible to delete frivolous proposals and impose penalties, such as confiscating a significant portion of their LUNC tokens.

CosmoSreXx responded by suggesting that non-legitimate proposals should be vetoed, resulting in the proposers losing their deposits unless the proposal could be genuinely controlled through governance.

Ultimately, the controversial proposal prompted a deep reflection within the LUNC community, underscoring the need for responsible decision-making within the ecosystem.

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.