- Coinbase was scrutinized for allegedly converting Songbird tokens, igniting legal battles and debates on crypto asset rights.
- Ripple’s CLO exposes contradictions in SEC’s crypto regulation, spotlighting the need for clear guidelines.
- Legal experts suggest Coinbase’s actions could breach principles of unjust enrichment, opening new avenues for litigation.
Coinbase has come under scrutiny over allegations related to handling certain customer assets. Fred Rispoli, an attorney at HODL Law firm, criticized the exchange for allegedly converting customer assets, specifically Songbird’s SGB tokens, to its control. This claim has stirred discussions within the legal and crypto communities about token holders’ rights and the exchanges’ responsibilities.
Rispoli’s remarks on X accused Coinbase of taking unauthorized control of customers’ SGB tokens, a move he likened to the conversion of customer property. He further revealed that HODL Law is actively pursuing litigation against Coinbase, highlighting a broader legal battle that could have significant implications for the crypto industry. Rispoli’s interest in related legal matters, such as the ongoing Ripple vs SEC case, underscores his firm’s engagement in cryptocurrency-related legal issues.
Additionally, lawyer Bill Morgan echoed Rispoli’s concerns on X, emphasizing the questionable nature of Coinbase’s actions regarding the SGB tokens. Morgan pointed out that Coinbase’s lack of agreement to participate in the SGB airdrop snapshot, which took place in 2020 and targeted participating XRP wallets, does not justify retaining or selling tokens not meant for the exchange.
Morgan suggested that were such a case brought in Australia, it could be framed as unjust enrichment, a principle that seeks to prevent one party from benefiting at another’s expense without a valid reason.
In a related development, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, highlighted inconsistencies in the regulatory stance between the SEC and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. Alderoty pointed out the contradiction between the SEC’s dismissal of crypto as a minor concern in the Coinbase lawsuit and Yellen’s call for legislative action to fill regulatory gaps. This ambiguity in regulatory perspectives challenges the crypto industry, seeking clarity and consistency in legal standards.
Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.
