Witt Defends Trump Crypto Ethics Terms After Clarity Act Senate Setback

Last Updated:
Coin Edition market report on the US media scrutiny of Donald Trump's crypto ventures, citing $800M.
Google News

Get our latest news first. Add us as your Preferred Source on Google and tap "Star" to prioritize our updates.

White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt defended President Donald Trump’s handling of ethics rules tied to the Clarity Act after the legislation failed to advance in the Senate.

Witt said Trump accepted significant restrictions on his crypto interests during negotiations, including provisions that could require him to divest certain holdings or place them in a blind trust. The Senate voted 49-50 on Sept. 15 against advancing the bill.

Ethics Fight Complicates Clarity Act

Witt said Trump’s crypto holdings became a central issue in negotiations, adding that Democrats focused heavily on the president’s financial interests while lawmakers worked on the legislation.

Related: SEC’s Uyeda Says Dropping Crypto Cases Helps Protect Agency Credibility

The ethics dispute was one of several issues surrounding the bill. Banking groups also raised concerns about stablecoin provisions, while Witt argued that major banks opposed the rules because stablecoins could compete with traditional deposits and payment services.

Witt also said the administration was prepared to let states pursue certain federal ethics violations involving the president. He described the proposed concessions as an unusually broad set of restrictions.

Regulators Continue Crypto Work

With the Clarity Act stalled, the SEC and CFTC can continue developing crypto rules under their existing authority. Both agencies have pursued regulatory initiatives since the Senate vote.

Trump’s financial interests in crypto have also remained part of the debate surrounding the legislation and its ethics provisions.

Related: Ripple’s David Schwartz Links SEC Experience to Glock’s Connecticut Lawsuit

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.