Longstanding Solana Critic Softens, Says SOL ‘Is Not Going Away’

Last Updated:
Solana (SOL)
  • Critic Justin Bons has softened his stance on SOL, citing network effects and stability improvements.
  • Bons believes Solana’s parallel processing capabilities and economic model make it a strong L1 contender.
  • The analyst commended the Solana community for their resilience during the bear market.

In a recent tweet, Justin Bons, a longstanding critic of Solana, shared his evolving perspective on the Solana (SOL) ecosystem. Bons acknowledged having softened over time for SOL, citing several key factors contributing to his changing viewpoint.

The critic highlighted Solana’s undeniable network effects, even when accounting for potentially inflated metrics. Bons also noted that stability on the Solana network had improved significantly by addressing issues he had previously pointed out years ago.

Moreover, Bons drew a comparison between SOL and Ethereum (ETH). He highlighted that since ETH had shifted away from layer-one scaling solutions, SOL had emerged as a strong advocate for an alternative approach—sharding. Notably, Bone believes sharding is a superior scaling solution but acknowledged the impressive potential of SOL’s parallel processing capabilities, which could challenge Ethereum’s stance.

Furthermore, Bons noted that SOL’s economic model, featuring tail inflation and a fee burn mechanism, aligned with his ideal economic design for a blockchain.

While Bons maintained some of his earlier critiques, he stressed that a blockchain should not be solely defined by its past. Additionally, he commended the Solana community for their civil response to his criticisms and highlighted their resilience during a bear market.

According to Bons, the model Solana has pulled distinguished it from the typical patterns of venture capital-driven chains. He said, “That is admittedly impressive, so credit where credit is due, SOL is not going away.”

Ultimately, Bons recognized SOL as a significant player in the crypto space. The critic mentioned that the blockchain checked many boxes alongside a diverse array of Layer 1 solutions. He emphasized that while perfection may be elusive, it was essential not to let it obstruct the pursuit of what is good and valuable in the crypto world.