Stellar’s Price and Social Metrics Move in Opposite Directions

Last Updated:
Stellar’s Price and Social Metrics Move in Opposite Directions
  • There is a developing divergence between Stellar’s social metrics and the price.
  • Stellar’s social mentions are increasing while the price is dropping.
  • XLM succumbed to a consolidation influenced by a triangle chart pattern.

There is a developing divergence between Stellar’s social metrics and its price direction. While the project’s mentions across social platforms keep rising, technical indicators and chart setup for Stellar’s native coin, XLM, tend in the opposite direction.

Data from Santiment, a market intelligence platform with social and on-chain metrics, shows that the social dominance and volume of XLM have pivoted and begun to rise. That means the coin’s mentions across crypto-related social platforms are increasing. Credit goes to the project team’s effort to rebrand and propagate Stellar as a solution-based innovation in the financial industry.

Stellar uploaded a captivating video clip on X (formerly Twitter) featuring the top British actor, Idris Elba. In the video, Elba plays a film director in a chaotic movie. The short video clip depicted a scenario where, despite the disorganization, individuals could independently execute cross-border transactions using Stellar’s blockchain solution.

Stellar attached a description to the video clip, captioned: “Fact-check: Stashing cash, waiting for remittances, unnecessary overdraft fees, and a lack of economic access should not be the norm. You know what’s broken; the Stellar network has the toolbox. Build better with Stellar.”

Respondents to Stellar’s post expressed their displeasure with the contrasting trends between the project’s promises and the direction of its native token. One respondent asked, “Why did the price crash?”

Stellar’s XLM succumbed to a consolidation influenced by a triangle pattern. Data from the daily chart on TradingView shows XLM turned downward after its price was resisted by the downward trendline of a triangle pattern. Since the rejection, XLM has lost about 10% of its value.

The current chart formation suggests some remaining momentum in the downward movement. The technical indicators suggest more downward pressure on XLM until it gets to the support created by the other side of the triangle that forms an upward trendline for the price.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions, as well as all the information shared in this price analysis, are published in good faith. Readers must do their own research and due diligence. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Coin Edition and its affiliates will not be held liable for any direct or indirect damage or loss.

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.