- 70% of EU users who left Binance after MiCA opted for self-custody, not a rival.
- Teng warned self-hosted wallets amplify risk as AML and KYC controls are absent.
- Binance pulled its Greek MiCA licence and paused EU deposits on 1 July 2026.
Europe’s landmark crypto regulation is producing an outcome its architects did not intend. Rather than driving users toward regulated platforms, MiCA appears to be pushing them in the opposite direction.
Binance CEO Richard Teng revealed that of the users who withdrew funds from Binance after MiCA came into effect, 70% moved their assets into self-hosted wallets, while only 30% shifted to other regulated platforms. The data suggests the regulation is consolidating crypto activity outside the supervised financial system rather than within it.
“Once it goes into a self-hosted wallet, the risks actually amplify,” Teng said. “You don’t have proper AML and KYC controls over those.”
Binance Pulled Its EU Licence Days Before the Deadline
The context makes the numbers more striking. Binance withdrew its Greek MiCA licence days before the regulatory deadline and paused EU deposits, trading and new sign-ups on 1 July 2026. Withdrawals remained open throughout.
The decision effectively forced EU users to make a choice: move to another regulated platform or take custody of their own assets. Most chose the latter.
Teng acknowledged the regulation’s intent is not the issue. “The spirit of MiCA is right,” he said. “We want to have a safe, well-regulated crypto industry. But the implementation needs to be practical.” The gap between that stated goal and the 70% self-custody figure is, by his own telling, where MiCA currently falls short.
The Opposite of What MiCA Was Designed to Do
MiCA was built on the premise that clearer rules would bring crypto activity into supervised, accountable frameworks. The Binance data points to a different dynamic. When compliance costs push regulated exchanges to restrict or exit markets, users do not simply migrate to the next licensed provider. Many walk away from the regulated system entirely.
Self-custody is legal and increasingly easy. Hardware wallets, mobile apps and non-custodial platforms are accessible to ordinary users. The assets remain on-chain and outside the reach of AML and KYC frameworks that MiCA was designed to reinforce.
Europe Falling Behind
The episode has reignited debate about whether heavy-handed regulation serves its stated purpose in a market where the underlying technology enables users to opt out entirely. Critics argue that pushing users toward self-custody does not reduce risk. It simply moves risk out of the regulated perimeter where authorities can monitor it.
For European regulators, the Binance figures present an uncomfortable question: if compliance pressure drives users away from supervised platforms rather than toward them, the regulation may be making the system harder to oversee, not easier.
Related: What Are KOLs Discussing About the Cryptocurrency Market Today?
Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.
