- Bitcoin Conference 2026 drew backlash for naming political figures and regulators as speakers.
- Simon Dixon said he no longer speaks at Bitcoin conferences over centralization concerns.
- Critics say more BTC supply is shifting from retail holders to ETFs and corporations.
Bitcoin Conference 2026, scheduled for April 27-29 in Las Vegas, is facing criticism from early Bitcoin investors after its speaker lineup was shared online.
The lineup includes a mix of corporate executives, political figures, and regulators. Confirmed speakers include Michael Saylor, Jack Dorsey, Todd Blanche, Kash Patel, Paul Atkins, Mike Selig, David Bailey, and Eric Trump.
The presence of senior US officials and financial figures sparked debate over whether these events are moving away from Bitcoin’s original anti-centralization roots.
Simon Dixon Doesn’t Like Speaking at Bitcoin Conferences
Long-time Bitcoin investor Simon Dixon said he no longer speaks at Bitcoin conferences. He said these events are being built and funded by groups trying to gather as much Bitcoin as possible inside financial-industrial complex wrappers.
He argued that users should resist this trend through self-custody and by avoiding custodial products and conferences tied to Bitcoin treasury firms.
His comments came after early adopter Heidi questioned whether regulators and state officials should be shaping Bitcoin’s future. She noted that Bitcoin was created to route around these institutions, yet they are now headline speakers at a major Bitcoin event.
The criticism targets a wider transition in the market. More Bitcoin is now held through ETFs, treasury companies, funds, and corporate balance sheets rather than directly by individuals.
Self-Custody Debate Returns
Dixon has repeatedly warned that Bitcoin ownership is changing form. Instead of users holding private keys directly, more supply is moving into managed structures where access depends on third parties.
This change has increased convenience for institutions, but it has also concentrated voting power, custody risk, and market influence in fewer hands.
Dixon has also recently linked Bitcoin’s role to rising geopolitical stress. He described week eight of the Iran-US-Israel conflict as a currency war involving gold, oil, swaps, and Bitcoin.
His point was that money systems are changing during global tension, and Bitcoin is now part of that contest.
Market Reaction Focuses on Dollar Pricing
Some traders said the deeper issue is not only conference speakers, but also how Bitcoin is valued.
Analyst MartyPartyMusic said institutions still control Bitcoin’s dollar price because the market remains heavily measured in USD terms. He argued Bitcoin needs to separate from dollar-based pricing and move toward direct pricing of goods and services in sats.
Another market participant dismissed the conference outrage, saying many officials may not understand Bitcoin, but if the network code remains unchanged, outside involvement may only add momentum.
A separate investor said retail holders sold large amounts of Bitcoin over the last year while corporations and businesses kept buying. According to that view, fear-based selling transferred supply from smaller holders to larger entities.
Related: US Commander Calls Bitcoin a Strategic Asset, Sen. Lummis Praises Move
Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.
